Children’s recognition of working donkeys’ needs in Tuliman, Mexico: Preliminary observations

Tamara Alejandra Tadich-Gallo, Aline de-Aluja, Roberto Cagigas, Francisco Galindo

Abstract


Veterinaria México OA
ISSN: 2448-6760

Cite this as:

  • Tadich Gallo TA, de Aluja A, Cagigas R, Galindo F. Children’s recognition of working donkeys’ needs in Tuliman, Mexico: Preliminary observations. Veterinaria México OA. 2016;3(4). doi: 10.21753/vmoa.3.4.404
Working equids remain an important source of income for thousands of families in developing countries. Children commonly participate actively in the husbandry practices associated with their working equids around the world, and can therefore have an important impact on their welfare. The aim of this study was to investigate the recognition of nine basic needs of donkeys by children between eight and eleven years of age. Animal welfare talks were provided in classrooms of schools in the community of Tuliman, Mexico, to children between eight and eleven years of age. Children were then asked to represent their donkey’s needs through drawings. The number and percentage of children able to recognize different needs was then quantified. Through their drawings, children easily recognized the need to provide food and water, but they rarely recognized the need for veterinary services. Inclusion of educational strategies at younger ages could have an impact on the welfare of working equids within communities.

Figure 2. Examples of children’s drawings including the needs they identified. Some of the needs drawn include corn (food), water, grooming and love, as represented by a heart (positive human-animal bond).


Keywords


working donkeys; needs; animal welfare; education; children.

References


Tadich T, Stuardo L. Strategies for improving the welfare of working equids in the Americas: a Chilean example. Rev Sci Tech Off Int Epiz. 2014; 33:203-211.

Tadich T, Escobar A, Pearson RA. Husbandry and welfare aspects of urban draught horses in the south of Chile. Arch Med Vet. 2008; 40:267-273.

Farm Animal Welfare Council. Second report on priorities for research and development in farm animal welfare. Farm Animal Welfare Council, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. London; 1993.

Broom DM. Needs, freedoms and the assessment of welfare. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 1988; 19:384-386. doi: 10.1016/0168-1591(88)90023-8.

Mellor DJ. Moving beyond the “five freedoms” by updating the “five provisions” and introducing aligned “animal welfare aims”. Animals. 2016; 6, Nº 59-1. doi: 10.3390/ani6100059.

Myers OE, Saunders CD, Garrett E. What do children think animals need? Aesthetic and psycho-social conceptions. Environ Educ Res. 2003; 9:305-325. doi: 10.1080/13504620303461.

Noddings N. Caring. Berkeley, University of California Press. 1984.

de Aluja A. The welfare of working equids in México. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 1998; 59:19-29. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(98)00117-8.

Pritchard JC, Lindberg AC, Main DCJ, Whay HR. Assessment of the welfare of working horses, mules and donkeys, using health and behavior parameters. Prev Vet Med. 2005; 69:265-283. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2005.02.002.

Wilson RT. Specific welfare problems associated with working horses. Chapter 9. In: Waran N, editor. The welfare of horses. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Springer. The Netherlands. Pp 203-218. 2007.

Fraser D, Weary DM, Pajor EA, Milligan BN. Scientific conception of animal welfare that reflects ethical concerns. Anim Welf. 1997; 6:187-205.

Damerell P, Howe C, Milner-Gulland EJ. Child-orientated environmental education influences adult knowledge and household behavior. Environ Res Lett. 2013; 8:015016. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/8/1/015016.

Fidler M, Coleman P, Roberts A. Empathic response to animal suffering: societal versus family influence. Anthrozoos. 2000; 13:48-51.

McPhedran S. A review of the evidence for associations between empathy, violence, and animal cruelty. Aggress Violent Beh. 2009; 14:1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2008.07.005.

Kellert SR. Attitudes towards animals: age related development among children. In: MW Fox and LD Mickley, editors. Advances in animal welfare science. Washington DC: The Humane Society of the United States; 1984. p. 43-60.

Calderón-Amor J, Luna D, Tadich T. Study of the levels of human-human and human-animal empathy of Veterinary Medicine students from Chile. J Vet Med Educ. Accepted. doi: 10.3138/jvme.0216-038R.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21753/vmoa.3.4.404

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.